<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://wiki.seculargames.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3ANon-Classic_Compendium</id>
	<title>Talk:Non-Classic Compendium - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.seculargames.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3ANon-Classic_Compendium"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.seculargames.org/index.php?title=Talk:Non-Classic_Compendium&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-06-14T07:21:06Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.45.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.seculargames.org/index.php?title=Talk:Non-Classic_Compendium&amp;diff=30124&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>imported&gt;Maximum: {{talk}}</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.seculargames.org/index.php?title=Talk:Non-Classic_Compendium&amp;diff=30124&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2017-02-20T15:43:57Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;{{talk}}&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{talk}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3/4/2013 Pendarin: The note at the top doesn&amp;#039;t make any sense. &amp;quot;Note: This page is a list of non-classic aspects of Everquest that do not exist on p1999.&amp;quot; In a sense, that&amp;#039;s a double negative. I&amp;#039;m thinking it should read something to the effect of: &amp;quot;This page is a list of classic aspects of Everquest that either do not exist on p1999, or are different on p1999 than on Live Everquest during classic era.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3/6/2013 Pendarin: Ok, the note finally makes sense to me. But this is like describing what an object is by describing what it isn&amp;#039;t. The list should be enormous, including every change made to the game after Velious, wouldn&amp;#039;t it? Wouldn&amp;#039;t it be more prudent to focus on the areas of P1999 that cannot be or are not modelling classic era, for whatever reason? On the other hand, I suppose this page is meant to address questions where people think something should be a certain way because they experienced it post-Velious, not realizing that it wasn&amp;#039;t that way pre-Luclin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: I guess it is supposed to be both, however the list of things &amp;quot;that will never exist on p99 because they aren&amp;#039;t classic&amp;quot; is essentially infinite, and quite large, as you point out. I think this is still useful to have where it overlaps, i.e. where original zones got revamped, pre-level 60 spells, etc etc. The list of things &amp;quot;that are wrong in p99 because they were different in classic&amp;quot; is also interesting. Feel free to reword the message/work on any part of the page as you see fit. --[[User:Ravhin|Ravhin]] 17:17, 7 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:: Ok, I gave it a shot and added some cues for future editors. Hopefully it&amp;#039;s a little more organized now (although I or someone still have to find some references to know how to categorize the ones I left in as &amp;quot;Uncategorized.&amp;quot; --[[User:Pendarin|Pendarin]] 20:53, 8 March 2013 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Client Limitations &amp;gt; Zone Geography &amp;gt; Paineel door ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For what it is worth, I would like to claim that this line is incorrect:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not able to swim through The Hole door crack in Paineel, unless a smaller race.reference? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I personally followed a high-level bard through that crack as a newbie erudite, less than a month after Paineel first opened. I remember the experience vividly.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>imported&gt;Maximum</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>